Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics

Subscriber Access

Coastal development in major cities has long been a terrain of opportunity and contention—shaped at once by the pursuit of capital (premium views, scarce land, and the promise of reclamation), by civic demands for public access and collective waterfront life, and by contemporary aspirations for sustainability and place-defining urban identity. Precisely because these agendas rarely align, extracting the full potential of waterfront sites is never straightforward.

Yet in New York City and Hong Kong, we can trace each city's ambitions—despite differing strategies, priorities, and political logics—through a set of keystone projects that anchor their coastlines. Read together, these projects reveal not only what each city chooses to value, but also what it is willing to trade off in order to build at the edge.

Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics - Image 2 of 20Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics - Image 3 of 20Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics - Image 4 of 20Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics - Image 5 of 20Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics - More Images+ 15

Content Loader

Image gallery

See allShow less
About this author
Cite: Jonathan Yeung. "Building at the Edge: New York and Hong Kong’s Competing Waterfront Logics" 05 Feb 2026. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1038456/building-at-the-edge-new-york-and-hong-kongs-competing-waterfront-logics> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.