1. ArchDaily
  2. Building Services

Building Services: The Latest Architecture and News

Beyond the Dropped Ceiling: 10 Interior Projects for Making Services and Conduits Part of the Architecture

Subscriber Access | 

In contemporary interior architecture, service provisionsmechanical, electrical, HVAC, plumbing—are almost always treated as elements to be concealed. Thickened wall cavities, extensive dropped ceilings, and, in regions where solid construction such as brick or concrete prevails, furred-out walls are routinely employed to hide these systems. This approach has become so normalized that it often forms the starting assumption for spatial planning, inherently constraining imagination and reducing the range of spatial possibilities. The priority shifts towards covering-up, rather than exploring how these systems might coexist visibly within a design language.

Beyond the Dropped Ceiling: 10 Interior Projects for Making Services and Conduits Part of the Architecture - Image 1 of 4Beyond the Dropped Ceiling: 10 Interior Projects for Making Services and Conduits Part of the Architecture - Image 2 of 4Beyond the Dropped Ceiling: 10 Interior Projects for Making Services and Conduits Part of the Architecture - Image 3 of 4Beyond the Dropped Ceiling: 10 Interior Projects for Making Services and Conduits Part of the Architecture - Image 4 of 4Beyond the Dropped Ceiling: 10 Interior Projects for Making Services and Conduits Part of the Architecture - More Images+ 35

Building Methods in Focus: The Solid vs Hollow Partitioning Debate

Subscriber Access | 

Two primary building approaches are commonly identified in architecture and design: solid versus hollow construction. These methods vary significantly across different cultures and regions, specifically for interior partitioning systems, when they appear interchangeable. Each has its own established practices influenced by local materials, labor preferences, climatic conditions, and cultural traditions. When architects and designers focus on their local context, it is easy to overlook the broader construction assumptions, limiting design flexibility and methodology. This raises an important question: How do these two building approaches differ?

Focusing mainly on interior systems, the distinctions between solid and hollow construction largely stem from the availability of materials and workforce preferences. For example, in the United States and Japan, stud walls, both wood and metal, are frequently used for partitioning. Conversely, brick remains the predominant material for partition walls in regions such as Hong Kong and southern China. Why do we build differently, and what are the benefits and challenges of each building methodology?

Building Methods in Focus: The Solid vs Hollow Partitioning Debate - Image 1 of 4Building Methods in Focus: The Solid vs Hollow Partitioning Debate - Image 2 of 4Building Methods in Focus: The Solid vs Hollow Partitioning Debate - Image 3 of 4Building Methods in Focus: The Solid vs Hollow Partitioning Debate - Image 4 of 4Building Methods in Focus: The Solid vs Hollow Partitioning Debate - More Images+ 14

Integrating New Material Systems and Future-Proofing Listed Buildings

Listed buildings are important architectural testaments to a society's rich and diverse history. Formally recognizing these buildings protects their significant architectural elements from alterations and demolitions while creating socio-economic avenues to aid their conservation. However, these buildings also run at risk of being alienated from new materials and modern building systems that allow them to function optimally today.

Integrating new materials and building services without interfering with the building’s original character is a unique design challenge. Whether adding new materials during structural renovations or integrating modern fire protection systems, there is a need for sensitivity and balance. This applies to various elements of listed buildings, including walls, floors, roofing, and façades, ensuring they are future-proofed for an extended lifespan.

Integrating New Material Systems and Future-Proofing Listed Buildings - Image 1 of 4Integrating New Material Systems and Future-Proofing Listed Buildings - Image 2 of 4Integrating New Material Systems and Future-Proofing Listed Buildings - Image 3 of 4Integrating New Material Systems and Future-Proofing Listed Buildings - Image 4 of 4Integrating New Material Systems and Future-Proofing Listed Buildings - More Images+ 1

Leveraging Building Services as a Framework for the Evolution of Building Envelopes

Rising demands for energy efficiency, technical functionality, and interior comfort in buildings necessitate the development of more efficient building envelope constructions. The building envelope serves as a mediator between a building's exterior and interior. In today's architectural landscape, it performs a multitude of functions to enhance the building's performance. These functions include building control systems, energy supply (such as gas and electricity), and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), among others. These elements primarily determine the functionality, efficiency, and safety of building spaces. Given that the nature of building envelopes heavily depends on these services, how can they serve as primary frameworks for building design development?

Leveraging Building Services as a Framework for the Evolution of Building Envelopes - Image 1 of 4Leveraging Building Services as a Framework for the Evolution of Building Envelopes - Image 2 of 4Leveraging Building Services as a Framework for the Evolution of Building Envelopes - Image 3 of 4Leveraging Building Services as a Framework for the Evolution of Building Envelopes - Image 4 of 4Leveraging Building Services as a Framework for the Evolution of Building Envelopes - More Images+ 5