Critical Round-Up: Did Aravena's 2016 Venice Biennale Achieve its Lofty Goals?

Subscriber Access

The XV International Architecture Exhibition at the Venice Biennale opened its doors last month. Under the directorship of Chilean Pritzker Prize-winner Alejandro Aravena, “Reporting the front” asked architects to go beyond “business as usual” and investigate concealed built environments – conflict zones and urban slums, as well as locations suffering from housing shortage, migrations and environmental disasters. Clearly, the aim of this Biennale is to open the profession to new fields of engagement and share knowledge on how to improve people’s quality of life.

This stance that has been highly criticized by Patrik Schumacher, director of Zaha Hadid Architects, who believes that architects “are not equipped to [address these issues]. It’s not the best value for our expertise.” But is this a view shared by the rest of the design world and its critics? What are the limits and benefits of this “humanitarian architecture”? Read on to find out critics’ comments.

Critical Round-Up: Did Aravena's 2016 Venice Biennale Achieve its Lofty Goals? - More Images+ 1

Content Loader
About this author
Cite: Marie Chatel. "Critical Round-Up: Did Aravena's 2016 Venice Biennale Achieve its Lofty Goals?" 27 Jun 2016. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/790218/critical-round-up-did-aravenas-2016-venice-biennale-achieve-its-lofty-goals> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.