Why 3D Printing Is Not As Sustainable As Its Defenders Say

Subscriber Access

is a column, penned by Christopher Brenny and presented by ArchDaily Materials, which investigates the innovative applications of in architecture.

On a purely aesthetic level, 3D printing holds great potential for buildings – all the possibilities of sculpted concrete without the bulky and expensive formwork. Taken to an extreme, it could someday make Hadid-like forms so cheap to execute that they become mundane (even for a non-architect) -- maybe even causing the profession to re-evaluate what qualifies as high design.

However, the more important advantage of 3D printing, what could spur its acceptance as a viable means of construction, is its supposed sustainability. Among its oft-cited advantages are a use of “green” materials and a reduction in construction waste. However, is 3D Printing really as sustainable as its defenders contend?

Content Loader
About this author
Cite: Christopher Brenny. "Why 3D Printing Is Not As Sustainable As Its Defenders Say" 16 Jul 2014. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/527927/why-3d-printing-is-not-as-sustainable-as-its-defenders-say> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.