Why closing streets to cars does not increase traffic

Subscriber Access

Departing from the 20th-century logic that shaped most cities, deprioritizing cars in urban development and reducing their designated street space does not worsen congestion. On the contrary, reclaiming road space by reducing vehicle lanes prompts a shift in transit habits. People increasingly opt for sustainable alternatives—such as walking, cycling, or public transit—which significantly reduces the volume of private vehicles.

This traffic redistribution phenomenon, known as "traffic evaporation," consistently shows that congestion has proven far less severe than decision-makers anticipated in cities implementing these measures. Nevertheless, despite over two decades of evidence on the subject, many urban planners still cling to the belief that adding more lanes improves flow, as highlighted by The City Fix.

Content Loader

Image gallery

See allShow less
About this author
Cite: Cidade, Somos. "Why closing streets to cars does not increase traffic" [Por que fechar ruas para automóveis não aumenta o trânsito] 07 Jul 2026. ArchDaily. (Trans. Romullo Baratto) Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1132150/why-closing-streets-to-cars-does-not-increase-traffic> ISSN 0719-8884
Image: Prefeitura de São Paulo. Courtesy of Caops Planejado

为什么对汽车关闭街道不会加剧交通拥堵

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.