CAU speaks out against bill that could affect fields of architectural practice

The Council for Architecture and Urbanism of Brazil is issuing a public statement to clarify its opposition to Bill (PL) No. 9818/2018 and Legislative Decree Project (PDC) No. 901/2018, currently before the Chamber of Deputies. These proposals compromise the regulation of the architecture and urban planning profession and jeopardize crucial public safeguards regarding health, safety, and the environment.

Bill 9818/2018 proposes the repeal of two fundamental clauses of the Architecture and Urban Planning Law (Law 12,378/2010)—specifically paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 3, transcribed below and highlighted in bold: 

Art. 3 The fields of professional practice for architecture and urban planning are defined by national curriculum guidelines governing the training of professional architects and urban planners, in which core foundational and professional knowledge establish the unity of professional practice. 

§ 1 The Council for Architecture and Urbanism of Brazil (CAU/BR) shall specify, in accordance with the provisions of the caput, the areas of practice exclusive to architects and urban planners and those shared with other regulated professions. 

§ 2 Areas of practice in which the lack of a higher education degree exposes service users to risk or material damage regarding safety, health, or the environment shall be considered exclusive to specialized professionals. 

PDC No. 901/2018, in turn, seeks to suspend the effects of CAU/BR Resolution No. 51, issued on July 12, 2013, which read as follows: 

(...) “establishes the exclusive areas of practice for architects and urban planners and other areas shared with other regulated professions” 

For architecture and urban planning professionals, it is important to note that CAU/BR has closely monitored the progress of these bills from the beginning. The council has kept lawmakers, the Executive Branch, and the Forum of Federal Councils of Regulated Professions informed about the harmful effects both bills could have on professional regulation and, consequently, on society as a whole. 

It is important to clarify that: 

§ 4 In the event that CAU/BR regulations regarding the field of practice of architects and urban planners contradict those of another professional council, the conflict shall be resolved through a joint resolution by both councils. 

§ 5 Pending the issuance of the joint resolution mentioned in § 4, or, in the event of an impasse, until the dispute is resolved through arbitration or legal proceedings, the regulation of the council that guarantees the professional the broadest scope of practice shall apply. 

Accordingly, CAU/BR reaffirms its commitment to the multidisciplinary nature of the professional practice of architects and urban planners across their various fields of practice, with a view toward societal development.

This document was drafted and unanimously approved by the 77th Ordinary Plenary Session of the Council for Architecture and Urbanism of Brazil. 

Brasília, April 27, 2018

This article was written by . The translation is powered by AI.

Vote discordo! Projeto de Lei pretende tirar do CAU a decisão sobre as áreas de atuação da arquitetura

Um projeto de lei apresentado no final de março deste ano pretende revogar dois parágrafos da Lei 12.378 de 31 de dezembro julho de 2010 que rege o exercício da profissão de arquiteto e urbanista.

About this author
Cite: Br, Cau. "CAU speaks out against bill that could affect fields of architectural practice" [CAU se manifesta contra o Projeto de Lei que pode afetar as áreas de atuação da arquitetura] 04 Jul 2026. ArchDaily. (Trans. Baratto, Romullo) Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1114861/cau-speaks-out-against-bill-that-could-affect-fields-of-architectural-practice> ISSN 0719-8884
Photography via Visualhunt.com

巴西建筑与城市规划委员会(CAU)发声反对可能影响建筑执业范围的法案

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.