How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention

Subscriber Access

Whether for design competitions or architectural awards, buildings are often judged for what they offer–the programmed functions, the form, or the visual delight. In a minority of cases, it is the absence or the reduction of intervention that made a project successful. In 1971, a high-profile architectural competition in Paris was won by a proposal that only utilized half the available site, giving the rest as an urban space to the city. In London, a proposal to convert a disused power station with minimal additions, leaving large spaces untouched, won a design competition in 1994. The Stirling Prize, the UK's most prestigious architectural award, in 2017 was won by a proposal that was little more than an empty platform. These examples of cultural buildings from Northwestern Europe illustrate how the absence of intervention can provide more.

How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention - Image 2 of 19How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention - Image 3 of 19How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention - Image 4 of 19How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention - Image 5 of 19How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention - More Images+ 14

Pompidou Center, Paris

Content Loader

Image gallery

See allShow less
About this author
Cite: Mohieldin Gamal. "How Not to Build: Architecture by the Absence of Intervention" 22 Aug 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1033320/how-not-to-build-architecture-by-the-absence-of-intervention> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.