As major cities continue to develop, we face intriguing challenges regarding the preservation and adaptive reuse of significant buildings, sites, and artifacts. This poses a complex question that involves political history, architectural theory, and cultural significance. Adaptive reuse extends beyond architectural and spatial designs; it allows cities and communities to reflect, reevaluate, and reinterpret their history from different perspectives. However, unlike books and words, buildings may not withstand the test of time themselves and serve as firsthand evidence of the stories they tell. How should we question ourselves on what to preserve and demolish? How can communities be involved in the active restoration or adaptation of historic buildings?
While this may have been an age-old challenge to many already developed Western cities, there is an increasing excitement surrounding Asia, mainly due to the complex and rich colonial history of numerous towns in the region. Politically, amid rising tensions between countries, it becomes crucial to consider the intricate ties between cities and their buildings. Is it possible to analyze built structures solely based on the merit and significance of architectural contributions without being sensitive and aware of ongoing political tensions? Furthermore, what about the dilemma and inherent conflict arising from the takeover of nations during colonial times? Does celebrating these architectural achievements silently endorse colonialism and show a lack of respect for local history? These are complex questions that should continue to be debated and examined, stimulating intellectual discourse in the field of urban development.
