Vladimir Belogolovsky

Founder of the New York-based non-profit Curatorial Project. Trained as an architect at Cooper Union in New York, Belogolovsky has written nine books, including New York: Architectural Guide (DOM, 2019), and Conversations with Architects in the Age of Celebrity (DOM, 2015).

BROWSE ALL FROM THIS AUTHOR HERE

Victor Legorreta: “Sometimes, Architects Take Themselves Too Seriously”

As the son of famed Mexican architect Ricardo Legorreta, and now the leader of the firm which he joined under his father in 1989, Victor Legorreta is one of Mexico’s most visible architects. In this interview, the latest in Vladimir Belogolovsky’s “City of Ideas” series, Legorreta discusses the complexities of following in the footsteps of his father and how, in his view, good architecture is made.

Vladimir Belogolovsky: What kind of projects are you working on at this moment?

Victor Legorreta: We work on a variety of projects—about 60 percent are in Mexico and the rest are abroad. Mexico City is increasingly becoming a vertical city in its attempt to reverse its tendency of growing into an endless and dysfunctional sprawl. We are working on several mixed-use towers with retail, entertainment, restaurants, offices, and residential uses in a single building to enable people to find everything they need within easy reach, to lessen the pressure on traffic, which in the city is now among the worst in the world. We are also working with The Aga Khan Foundation on two projects—a university in Tanzania and a hospital and university in Uganda.

Victor Legorreta: “Sometimes, Architects Take Themselves Too Seriously” - Arch Daily InterviewsVictor Legorreta: “Sometimes, Architects Take Themselves Too Seriously” - Arch Daily InterviewsVictor Legorreta: “Sometimes, Architects Take Themselves Too Seriously” - Arch Daily InterviewsVictor Legorreta: “Sometimes, Architects Take Themselves Too Seriously” - Arch Daily InterviewsVictor Legorreta: “Sometimes, Architects Take Themselves Too Seriously” - More Images+ 54

Interview with Javier Sanchez: “Where are the Projects? Let’s Find Them!”

In the decade since the start of the financial crisis, there has been an explosion in the number of architectural practices that have pursued unusual and ingenious business models—among the most popular of which is the concept of the developer-architect, who serves as their own client. With his architecture firm and development company JSa, Javier Sanchez has been proving this concept since long before the financial crisis hit. In the latest interview of his City of Ideas series—and the third of his interviews with Mexican architects after Enrique Norten, Alberto Kalach and Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo—Vladimir Belogolovsky speaks to Sanchez about the benefits of working as one’s own client and how JSa leverages its business model to improve the city.

Interview with Javier Sanchez: “Where are the Projects? Let’s Find Them!” - Image 14 of 4Interview with Javier Sanchez: “Where are the Projects? Let’s Find Them!” - Image 20 of 4Interview with Javier Sanchez: “Where are the Projects? Let’s Find Them!” - Image 31 of 4Interview with Javier Sanchez: “Where are the Projects? Let’s Find Them!” - Image 44 of 4Interview with Javier Sanchez: “Where are the Projects? Let’s Find Them!” - More Images+ 53

Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art”

Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art” - Image 67 of 4
Estudio Iturbide, Coyoacán, México City, 2016-2017. Image Courtesy of Taller de Arquitectura Mauricio Rocha + Gabriela Carrillo

In August I moderated a round table at UNAM in Mexico City in which I posed a provocative question: is architecture art? The participants, architects Mauricio Rocha, Gabriela Carrillo, and Victor Legorreta argued that despite architecture’s limitations, it is architects’ attempts to overcome them that makes it art. Meanwhile Gabriel de la Mora, an artist trained as an architect, drew a line, separating the two disciplines: “Art is art and architecture is architecture,” he insisted. Yet both sides were not quite satisfied with their initial assertions and the discussion continued, opening up to many interesting positions that pulled and pushed the interlocutors closer together and further apart with every attempt to give an explanation. I loved the discussion and I hoped we would not reach any definitive answers; the last thing we need in architecture is a consensus. It is our insistence on questioning that leads to new visions and unique solutions.

The following is my conversation with Rocha and Carrillo, as part of my City of Ideas column, in which we talked about their desire to make gravity feel light, seeing each project as a dialogue, their love for making decisions based on accidents, and their disinterest in being perfect. The architects strive to achieve a “meaningful silence” and they prefer to pay no notice to that line between architecture and art, the boundary that so few architects even dare to approach.

Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art” - Image 4 of 4Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art” - Image 13 of 4Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art” - Image 35 of 4Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art” - Image 57 of 4Mauricio Rocha and Gabriela Carrillo: “It is Important Not to Doubt That Architecture is Art” - More Images+ 67

Alberto Kalach: “Imagine if All Rooftops in Our City Were Green!”

Last month I went on an enlightening trip to Mexico City, during which I had a chance to meet with half a dozen leading Mexican architects and critics. Those meetings included insightful conversations with Miquel Adrià, Tatiana Bilbao, Victor Legorreta, Mauricio Rocha, and Michel Rojkind among others (many of which will also feature in future installments of City of Ideas). I asked them many different questions, but two were consistent: “who would you name as Mexico’s best architect at this moment?” and “what one building built in the capital over the last decade is your favorite?” All of my interviewees pointed to Alberto Kalach (born 1960) and his Vasconcelos Library (2007). My Conversation with Kalach took place the next day after visiting the library on the rooftop of another one of his iconic buildings, Tower 41 overlooking Bosque de Chapultepec, Mexico City’s Central Park. We spoke about books, libraries, and his idea of buildings as inventions.

Alberto Kalach: “Imagine if All Rooftops in Our City Were Green!” - Image 6 of 4Alberto Kalach: “Imagine if All Rooftops in Our City Were Green!” - Image 55 of 4Alberto Kalach: “Imagine if All Rooftops in Our City Were Green!” - Image 77 of 4Alberto Kalach: “Imagine if All Rooftops in Our City Were Green!” - Image 83 of 4Alberto Kalach: “Imagine if All Rooftops in Our City Were Green!” - More Images+ 90

Christian de Portzamparc: “No One But an Architect Can Solve the Problems of the Contemporary City”

Of the Pritzker Prize’s illustrious list of laureates, the 1994 winner Christian de Portzamparc is perhaps the least covered by the media. However, this relatively low profile belies the subtle and insightful understanding of architectural and urban issues that in many ways puts him decades ahead of the curve – with the sociologically-led principles he has been developing since the early 1980s now becoming widely popular in architectural circles. In this interview, the latest in Vladimir Belogolovsky’s “City of Ideas” column, Portzamparc explains the journey that led to this unique take on architecture.

Christian de Portzamparc: “No One But an Architect Can Solve the Problems of the Contemporary City” - Image 12 of 4Christian de Portzamparc: “No One But an Architect Can Solve the Problems of the Contemporary City” - Image 33 of 4Christian de Portzamparc: “No One But an Architect Can Solve the Problems of the Contemporary City” - Image 52 of 4Christian de Portzamparc: “No One But an Architect Can Solve the Problems of the Contemporary City” - Image 65 of 4Christian de Portzamparc: “No One But an Architect Can Solve the Problems of the Contemporary City” - More Images+ 64

Interview With Thom Mayne: “I Am a Pragmatic Idealist”

For many observers, Thom Mayne might easily be considered the most unpredictable personality in architecture. Once labeled the “bad boy of architecture” by critics—a moniker which he has, at times, enthusiastically adopted and even encouraged—Mayne's actions in the architecture world can range from something as responsible as designing one of the United States' most sustainable university campuses to something as outrageous as proposing one of the world's tallest towers in a revered Austrian mountain town. In this interview, the latest from Vladimir Belogolovsky's “City of Ideas” series, Mayne discusses his ideas, his past statements on architecture, and where he thinks the profession will go next. The interview was originally published by the Berlin-based SPEECH Magazine.

Interview With Thom Mayne: “I Am a Pragmatic Idealist” - Image 1 of 4Interview With Thom Mayne: “I Am a Pragmatic Idealist” - Image 2 of 4Interview With Thom Mayne: “I Am a Pragmatic Idealist” - Image 3 of 4Interview With Thom Mayne: “I Am a Pragmatic Idealist” - Image 4 of 4Interview With Thom Mayne: “I Am a Pragmatic Idealist” - More Images+ 29

Soo Chan: “Architecture is About Preserving a Way of Life, Not Simply Introducing a New Formal Language”

By combining such concepts as phenomenology, sustainability and formal exploration, which have become part of a particularly Singaporean conception of architecture, Soo Chan of SCDA Architects occupies an unusual niche within the architecture profession. To complement this wide range of interests, his firm also engages in a wide range of activities, working on architecture, landscape, and interiors projects, and even acting as its own developer on a number of occasions. In this latest interview from Vladimir Belogolovsky's “City of Ideas” column, Chan discusses the early experiences that led to his current understanding of architecture, and how the context of Singapore has affected his designs.

Vladimir Belogolovsky: Was architecture on your mind from an early age? What was it that first attracted you to the discipline?

Soo Chan: I was deeply influenced by the house I grew up in, the Khoo Kongsi compound in Penang, an island off the west coast of Malaysia. Khoo Kongsi was planned around a central communal courtyard where many generations of my extended family lived, and it is a UNESCO World Heritage site today. I can still picture the spatial and light qualities of the long and narrow house I grew up in, punctuated with open air wells. I remember the smell of fresh rain coming deep into the house on to the sunken courts, and the pockets of light and darkness in the house.

Soo Chan: “Architecture is About Preserving a Way of Life, Not Simply Introducing a New Formal Language” - Image 1 of 4Soo Chan: “Architecture is About Preserving a Way of Life, Not Simply Introducing a New Formal Language” - Image 2 of 4Soo Chan: “Architecture is About Preserving a Way of Life, Not Simply Introducing a New Formal Language” - Image 3 of 4Soo Chan: “Architecture is About Preserving a Way of Life, Not Simply Introducing a New Formal Language” - Image 4 of 4Soo Chan: “Architecture is About Preserving a Way of Life, Not Simply Introducing a New Formal Language” - More Images+ 44

Paul Andreu: "I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested."

Paul Andreu: "I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested." - Image 4 of 4
Charles-de-Gaulle airport, Terminal 1, Paris, 1967-1974. Image © Paul Maurer

For 40 years, Paul Andreu was among the world's foremost airport design experts. Reflecting on this before the turn of the millennium, he stated that architectural historians of the future might consider the 1990s as “the age of the air terminal.” But shortly after this, he left the arena of airport design to focus on other large projects, many of them in China. In this interview, the latest of Vladimir Belogolovsky's “City of Ideas” series, Andreu explains why he made the switch and shares his thoughts on how good architecture is made—saying it often depends more on what you don't tell your client than what you do.

Paul Andreu: Before we start, I must explain something. I am an architect and engineer. For a long time I was not an independent architect but worked at and then was the head of airport works at Aéroports de Paris Ingénierie or ADPi, a subsidiary of Aéroports de Paris (ADP). This public establishment is not only in charge of the planning, design, and operation of three Paris-region airports, but is also involved in airport works all around the world, as well as other large-scale architectural projects. First, we did airports in France, then in the Middle East and Africa, then in China and all over Asia, and then we developed projects in other parts of the world. Most of the time we developed our projects from concept all the way through construction; although once we did just the concept for Kansai airport on a specially built island in the Bay of Osaka. As you know, it was designed by Renzo Piano and I consulted for him on function and circulation aspects.

Paul Andreu: "I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested." - Image 15 of 4Paul Andreu: "I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested." - Image 17 of 4Paul Andreu: "I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested." - Image 18 of 4Paul Andreu: "I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested." - Image 43 of 4Paul Andreu: I Would Only Take On a Project if the Ideas Were Mine. Otherwise, I Am Not Interested. - More Images+ 64

Emilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables”

Emilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables” - Image 5 of 4
Casa de Retiro Espiritual. Image Courtesy of Emilio Ambasz

While many of the pioneers of green architecture could arguably be criticized as technocratic and dry, this has never applied to Emilio Ambasz. His concept of “green over gray” has been pushing the debate around sustainability forwards since the 1970s, but alongside this concept he has developed a critical approach to architectural meaning and form-making which competes with many of architecture's more poetic practitioners. Ahead Vladimir Belogolovsky's upcoming exhibition of Ambasz's work, “Emilio Ambasz: Architecture Toward Nature,” which is on show at the Singapore's Urban Redevelopment Center from February 6th – 28th, here Belogolovsky shares his interview with the architect – the latest interview in his “City of Ideas” column.

Vladimir Belogolovsky: I read that you knew you wanted to be an architect at an early age and when you were 11, you even dared to propose an exhibition on American architecture in Buenos Aires. What was it that prompted your initial interest in architecture?

Emilio Ambasz: I was interested in architecture since I was nine, I think. I am a person of steady ideas. Once I have an idea that’s it, I persist. I wanted to become an architect and that led to my applying to Princeton. I sent my application with a wax seal telling them that I went to bed every night with the idea of wanting to be an architect and woke up every morning with this idea…

Emilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables” - Image 1 of 4Emilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables” - Image 2 of 4Emilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables” - Featured ImageEmilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables” - Image 3 of 4Emilio Ambasz: “I Detest Writing Theories, I Prefer Writing Fables” - More Images+ 31

Interview with Álvaro Siza: “Beauty Is the Peak of Functionality!”

Throughout the 60-year career of Álvaro Siza, his work has continuously defied categorization--having variously been described as “critical regionalism” and “poetic modernism,” with neither quite capturing the true essence of Siza's intuitive architecture. In this interview, the latest in Vladimir Belogolovsky's “City of Ideas” series, Siza discusses those attempts to categorize his work, his design approach and the role of beauty in his designs.

Vladimir Belogolovsky: Your student, Eduardo Souto de Moura said, “Siza’s houses are just like cats sleeping in the sun.”

Álvaro Siza: [Laughs.] Yes, he meant that my buildings assume the most natural postures on the site. There is also a reference in that to the human body.

Interview  with Álvaro Siza: “Beauty Is the Peak of Functionality!” - Image 1 of 4Interview  with Álvaro Siza: “Beauty Is the Peak of Functionality!” - Image 2 of 4Interview  with Álvaro Siza: “Beauty Is the Peak of Functionality!” - Image 3 of 4Interview  with Álvaro Siza: “Beauty Is the Peak of Functionality!” - Image 4 of 4Interview  with Álvaro Siza: “Beauty Is the Peak of Functionality!” - More Images+ 28

Sergei Tchoban: “We Cannot Avoid Looking At Architecture; Architecture Should Be Beautiful”

After receiving his education at the Repin Institute for Painting, Sculpture and Architecture in St. Petersburg, Sergei Tchoban moved to Germany at the age of 30. He now runs parallel practices in both Berlin and Moscow, after becoming managing partner of nps tchoban voss in 2003 and co-founding SPEECH with Sergey Kuznetsov in 2006. In 2009, the Tchoban Foundation was formed in Berlin to celebrate the lost art of drawing through exhibitions and publications. The Foundation’s Museum for Architectural Drawing was built in Berlin in 2013 to Tchoban’s design. In this latest interview for his “City of Ideas” series, Vladimir Belogolovsky spoke to Tchoban during their recent meeting in Paris about architectural identities, inspirations, the architect’s fanatical passion for drawing, and such intangibles as beauty.

Sergei Tchoban: “We Cannot Avoid Looking At Architecture; Architecture Should Be Beautiful” - Image 1 of 4Sergei Tchoban: “We Cannot Avoid Looking At Architecture; Architecture Should Be Beautiful” - Image 2 of 4Sergei Tchoban: “We Cannot Avoid Looking At Architecture; Architecture Should Be Beautiful” - Image 3 of 4Sergei Tchoban: “We Cannot Avoid Looking At Architecture; Architecture Should Be Beautiful” - Image 4 of 4Sergei Tchoban: “We Cannot Avoid Looking At Architecture; Architecture Should Be Beautiful” - More Images+ 40

Interview with Neil Durbach: “You Don't Want to do the Same Thing Again; You Want to do Better!"

Alongside Camilla Block and David Jaggers, Neil Durbach of Durbach Block Jaggers has carved out a unique place in Australian architecture. Known primarily for their carefully sculpted modernist houses, the firm's architecture is simultaneously rich in architectural references and thoroughly original. In this interview, the latest in Vladimir Belogolovsky's “City of Ideas” series, Durbach explains the true inspirations behind their work, why these inspirations have little to do with the public descriptions of their projects, and why for him, the intention of all of his architecture “is to win Corb’s approval.”

Vladimir Belogolovsky: You came to Australia while the Sydney Opera House was still under construction. Does this mean you were here even before going to the US?

Neil Durbach: Yes, I first came to Australia as an exchange student while still in high school.

VB: So you have seen the Opera under construction then. How special was that? Did that building change anything in particular in you?

ND: Well, at that time I wanted to be an artist. A friend took me on a boat to see it. It was kind of staggering... And I thought – you know, this is much more interesting than art. And I felt – maybe architecture is what I should pursue.

Interview with Neil Durbach: “You Don't Want to do the Same Thing Again; You Want to do Better!" - Image 8 of 4Interview with Neil Durbach: “You Don't Want to do the Same Thing Again; You Want to do Better!" - Image 19 of 4Interview with Neil Durbach: “You Don't Want to do the Same Thing Again; You Want to do Better!" - Image 28 of 4Interview with Neil Durbach: “You Don't Want to do the Same Thing Again; You Want to do Better!" - Image 36 of 4Interview with Neil Durbach: “You Don't Want to do the Same Thing Again; You Want to do Better! - More Images+ 37

Interview with WOHA: “The Only Way to Preserve Nature is to Integrate it into Our Built Environment”

Driven by the hyper-density of the city-state from which they operate, WOHA have emerged as Singapore's quintessential architects. Combining a locally-specific approach to climate control and spatial planning with an international approach to form and materials, their work holds lessons that can be instructive to architects in all climates. In this interview, the latest in his “City of Ideas” column, Vladimir Belogolovsky speaks to WOHA founders Wong Mun Summ and Richard Hassell about their environmental approach and the future of our global cities.

Interview with WOHA: “The Only Way to Preserve Nature is to Integrate it into Our Built Environment” - Image 3 of 4Interview with WOHA: “The Only Way to Preserve Nature is to Integrate it into Our Built Environment” - Image 9 of 4Interview with WOHA: “The Only Way to Preserve Nature is to Integrate it into Our Built Environment” - Image 11 of 4Interview with WOHA: “The Only Way to Preserve Nature is to Integrate it into Our Built Environment” - Image 17 of 4Interview with WOHA: “The Only Way to Preserve Nature is to Integrate it into Our Built Environment” - More Images+ 19

Jeanne Gang: “Without an Intellectual Construct Life is Boring”

Jeanne Gang, the founder of Studio Gang Architects, has made a name for herself as a designer who can design both show-stopping skyscrapers and sensitive small-scale buildings. From her breakout 2009 Aqua Tower project, to the hypothetical “Polis Station” proposal presented at last year's Chicago Architecture Biennial, Gang has established herself as perhaps Chicago's leading architect.

Gang is also included as part of Vladimir Belogolovsky's ongoing City of Ideas exhibition tour, representing Chicago among 9 other significant architects, each from a different global city. With the exhibition currently in Gang's home city at the Chicago Design Museum until February 25th, here as part of his City of Ideas column on ArchDaily Belogolovsky presents a shortened version of the interview featured in the exhibition.

Jeanne Gang: “Without an Intellectual Construct Life is Boring” - Image 1 of 4Jeanne Gang: “Without an Intellectual Construct Life is Boring” - Image 2 of 4Jeanne Gang: “Without an Intellectual Construct Life is Boring” - Image 3 of 4Jeanne Gang: “Without an Intellectual Construct Life is Boring” - Image 4 of 4Jeanne Gang: “Without an Intellectual Construct Life is Boring” - More Images+ 50

Bijoy Jain: “Architecture Is Not About an Image, It Is About Sensibility”

Bijoy Jain, the founder of Indian practice Studio Mumbai, has long been well-known for his earth-bound material sensibilities, and an approach to architecture that bridges the gap between Modernism and vernacular construction. The recent opening of the third annual MPavilion in Melbourne, this year designed by Jain, offered an opportunity to present this architectural approach on a global stage. In this interview as part of his “City of Ideas” series, Vladimir Belogolovsky speaks with Bijoy Jain about his design for the MPavilion and his architecture of “gravity, equilibrium, light, air and water.”

Bijoy Jain: “Architecture Is Not About an Image, It Is About Sensibility” - Image 1 of 4Bijoy Jain: “Architecture Is Not About an Image, It Is About Sensibility” - Image 2 of 4Bijoy Jain: “Architecture Is Not About an Image, It Is About Sensibility” - Image 3 of 4Bijoy Jain: “Architecture Is Not About an Image, It Is About Sensibility” - Image 4 of 4Bijoy Jain: “Architecture Is Not About an Image, It Is About Sensibility” - More Images+ 46

Paulo Mendes da Rocha: “Architecture Does Not Desire to Be Functional; It Wants to Be Opportune”

Paulo Mendes da Rocha is one of Brazil's most celebrated architects. And, in spite of the fact that very little of his work can be found outside São Paulo, his “Paulista Brutalism” is revered worldwide, earning him the Pritzker Prize in 2006 and, just last week, the Royal Institute of British Architects' Gold Medal. In light of the RIBA Gold Medal news, as part of his “City of Ideas” column, Vladimir Belogolovsky here shares an interview conducted with Mendes da Rocha in 2014. The interview was conducted in Mendes da Rocha's office in São Paulo with the help of Brazilian architect Wilson Barbosa Neto acting as translator, and was originally published in Belogolovsky's book, “Conversations with Architects in the Age of Celebrity.”

Paulo Mendes da Rocha: “Architecture Does Not Desire to Be Functional; It Wants to Be Opportune” - Image 1 of 4Paulo Mendes da Rocha: “Architecture Does Not Desire to Be Functional; It Wants to Be Opportune” - Image 2 of 4Paulo Mendes da Rocha: “Architecture Does Not Desire to Be Functional; It Wants to Be Opportune” - Image 3 of 4Paulo Mendes da Rocha: “Architecture Does Not Desire to Be Functional; It Wants to Be Opportune” - Image 4 of 4Paulo Mendes da Rocha: “Architecture Does Not Desire to Be Functional; It Wants to Be Opportune” - More Images+ 22

Project Meganom's Yuri Grigoryan: “Freedom is When You Realize that Anything is Possible”

Yuri Grigoryan founded Project Meganom in 1999 in Moscow with his partners Alexandra Pavlova, Iliya Kuleshov, and Pavel Ivanchikov. Together, the group all graduated from Moscow’s Architectural Institute, MArchI in 1991, the year of the Soviet Union’s collapse, and then practiced at the studio of Moscow architect Alexander Larin. Today Project Meganom is headed by Grigoryan, Iliya Kuleshov, Artem Staborovsky, and Elena Uglovskaya, and keeps in close contact with the theoretical side of architecture: Grigoryan teaches at his alma mater and until recently he was the Director of Education at Strelka Institute, founded in 2009 under the creative leadership of Rem Koolhaas, while in 2008 the practice was involved in the Venice Architecture Biennale with their San Stae project for curator Yuri Avvakumov's “BornHouse” exhibition. All of this gives Grigoryan an interesting overview of Russia's unique architectural context. In this interview from his “City of Ideas” column, Vladimir Belogolovsky speaks with Grigoryan about the issues facing Russian architecture and how Project Meganom has responded to those challenges.

Project Meganom's Yuri Grigoryan: “Freedom is When You Realize that Anything is Possible” - Image 1 of 4Project Meganom's Yuri Grigoryan: “Freedom is When You Realize that Anything is Possible” - Image 2 of 4Project Meganom's Yuri Grigoryan: “Freedom is When You Realize that Anything is Possible” - Image 3 of 4Project Meganom's Yuri Grigoryan: “Freedom is When You Realize that Anything is Possible” - Image 4 of 4Project Meganom's Yuri Grigoryan: “Freedom is When You Realize that Anything is Possible” - More Images+ 10

Interview with Zvi Hecker: “Good Architecture Cannot Be Legal; It Is Illegal!”

Throughout the course of his career, the forms present in Zvi Hecker's work have undergone significant changes – from the rigidly geometric shapes of his early work such as his Ramot Polin housing and Synagogue in the Negev Desert, to his more freeform recent works like the Jewish School he designed in Berlin. Hecker, though, sees all of his works as both consistent with each other and individual, describing himself as “an artist whose profession is architecture.” In this interview from his “City of Ideas” column, Vladimir Belogolovsky speaks with Hecker about his inspirations and the ideas that underpin his career.

Interview with Zvi Hecker: “Good Architecture Cannot Be Legal; It Is Illegal!” - Image 14 of 4Interview with Zvi Hecker: “Good Architecture Cannot Be Legal; It Is Illegal!” - Image 17 of 4Interview with Zvi Hecker: “Good Architecture Cannot Be Legal; It Is Illegal!” - Image 28 of 4Interview with Zvi Hecker: “Good Architecture Cannot Be Legal; It Is Illegal!” - Image 36 of 4Interview with Zvi Hecker: “Good Architecture Cannot Be Legal; It Is Illegal!” - More Images+ 34